{"id":416,"date":"2012-04-14T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-04-14T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/?p=416"},"modified":"2024-04-24T12:48:59","modified_gmt":"2024-04-24T12:48:59","slug":"epa-colluded-coverup-decades-monsanto-poisoning-118281","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/environment\/epa-colluded-coverup-decades-monsanto-poisoning-118281\/","title":{"rendered":"EPA Colluded in Coverup Of Decades Of Monsanto Poisoning"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"post-content\">\n<!--\nWidget Area: [All Content] Above \n~~~ --><br \/>\n<!-- hmt_widget_link_unit_1 --><\/p>\n<div class=\"all-content-above hmt_widget_link_unit_1\" id=\"hmt-widget-link-unit-1\">\n<div class=\"toplinkunit\">\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"clearFloat\"><\/div>\n<p><!--\nThe Post Title \n~~~ --><\/p>\n<p><!--\nWidget Area: [Content Item] Above \n~~~ --><br \/>\n<!--\nWidget Area: [Content Item] Left \n~~~ --><br \/>\n<!--\nWidget Area: [Content Item] Right \n~~~ --><br \/>\n<!--\nThe content itself \n~~~ --><\/p>\n<div style=\"float: right; width: 340px; \">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"clear:both\">\n<\/div>\n<h3>New information reveals that EPA colluded with Monsanto\u2019s decades long cover up of the highly toxic chemicals Agent Orange toxin in their herbicide.<\/h3>\n<p>April 13th, 2012<br \/>\n<a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.blacklistednews.com\/EPA_Collusion_in_Monsanto_Coverup\/18949\/0\/0\/0\/Y\/M.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Blacklisted News<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>2,4-D and the dioxin pollution it creates are too dangerous to allow, period, but in the hands of bad actors like Monsanto and Dow Chemical the dangers increase exponentially. What\u2019s the Environmental Protection Agency doing? Helping coverup the chemical companies\u2019 crimes!<\/p>\n<p>In February, Monsanto agreed to pay up to <a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2012-02-24\/monsanto-says-it-settled-west-virginia-lawsuits-over-nitro-plant.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">$93 million<\/a> in a <a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/blogs\/thetwo-way\/2012\/02\/23\/147302639\/monsanto-reaches-settlement-on-agent-orange-class-action-suit\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">class-action lawsuit<\/a> brought by the residents of Nitro, West Virginia, for dioxin exposure from accidents and pollution at an herbicide plant that operated in their town from 1929 to 2004.<\/p>\n<p>That may seem like justice, but it is actually the result of Monsanto\u2019s extraordinary efforts to hide the truth, evade criminal prosecution and avoid legal responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>A brief criminal fraud investigation conducted by the EPA revealed that Monsanto used a disaster at their Nitro, WV, plant to manufacture \u201cevidence\u201d that dioxin exposure produced a skin condition called chloracne, but was not responsible for neurological health effects or cancers such as Non-Hodgkins lymphoma.<\/p>\n<p>These conclusions were repeatedly utilized by EPA and the Veterans Administration to deny help to citizens exposed to dioxin, if these persons did not exhibit chloracne.<\/p>\n<p>The EPA knew the truth about Monsanto\u2019s dioxin crimes, but it decided to hide it. Why? It would have affected us all. EPA\u2019s brief criminal investigation of Monsanto included evidence that Monsanto knowingly contaminated Lysol with dioxin, even as the product was being marketed for cleaning babies\u2019 toys.<\/p>\n<p>Here are the details of this jaw-dropping and heart-breaking case of corporate criminality and EPA collusion.<\/p>\n<p>According to <a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.naturalnews.com\/023254_Monsanto_PCB_toxic.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Natural News<\/a>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>In the town of Nitro, West Virginia, Monsanto operated a chemical plant from 1929 to 1995, making an herbicide that had dioxin as a by-product. The name dioxin refers to a group of highly toxic chemicals that have been linked to heart and liver disease, human reproductive disorders, and developmental problems. Dioxin persists in the environment and accumulates in the body, even in small amounts. In 2001, the U.S. government listed dioxin as a \u201cknown human carcinogen\u201d.<\/li>\n<li>In 1949, at the Nitro plant, a pressure valve blew on a container of this herbicide, producing a plume of vapor and white smoke that drifted out over the town. Residue coated the interior of buildings and those inside them with a fine black powder. Within days, workers experienced skin eruptions, and many were diagnosed with chloracne, a long lasting and disfiguring condition. Others felt intense pains in their chest, legs and trunk. A medical report from the time said the explosion \u201ccaused a systemic intoxication in the workers involving most major organ systems.\u201d Doctors detected a strong odor coming from the patients they described as men \u201cexcreting a foreign chemical through their skins\u201d.<\/li>\n<li>Monsanto downplayed the incident, saying that the contaminant was \u201cfairly slow acting\u201d and only an irritant to the skin.<\/li>\n<li>Meanwhile, the Nitro plant continued to produce herbicides, In the 1960\u2032s it manufactured Agent Orange, the powerful herbicide used by the U.S. military to defoliate jungles during the Vietnam War, and which became the focus of lawsuits by veterans contending they had been harmed by exposure to the chemical. Agent Orange also created dioxin as a by-product.<\/li>\n<li>At the Nitro plant, dioxin waste went into landfills, storm drains, streams, sewers, into bags with the herbicide, and then the waste was burned out into the air. Dioxin from the plant can still be found in nearby streams, rivers, and fish.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>From <a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=gWA_IBakjyo\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">NativeInterface<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>According to <a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sourcewatch.org\/index.php?title=Monsanto%2C_Agent_Orange_and_Dioxins#Dioxins\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Source Watch<\/a>, in 1990, Cate Jenkins, a PhD chemist at EPA, became convinced that Monsanto had deliberately manipulated studies of worker victims of the Nitro disaster showing that dioxin was a human carcinogen.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Jenkins wrote a memorandum entitled \u201cNewly Revealed Fraud by Monsanto in an Epidemiological Study Used by EPA to Assess Human Health Effects from Dioxins.\u201d Read the memo at <a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.purefood.org\/dioxcov.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">PureFood.org.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>According to her <a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.purefood.org\/dioxcov.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">memo<\/a>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Dr. Raymond Suskind at the University of Cincinnati was hired by Monsanto to study the workers at Monsanto\u2019s Nitro, West Virginia plant. Dr. Suskind stated in published studies in question that chloracne, a skin condition was the prime indicator of high human dioxin exposures, and no other health effects would be observed in the absence of this condition. Unpublished studies by Suskind, however, indicate the fallacy of this statement. No workers except those having chloracne were ever examined by Suskind or included in his study. In other words, if no workers without chloracne were ever examined for other health effects, there is no basis for asserting that chloracne was \u201cthe hallmark of dioxin intoxication.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>These conclusions have been repeatedly utilized by EPA, the Veterans Administration, etc., to deny any causation by dioxin of health effects of exposed citizens, if these persons did not exhibit chloracne.<\/li>\n<li>The results of Dr. Suskind\u2019s studies also were diluted by the fact that the exposed group contained not only individuals having chloracne (a genuine, but not the only effect of dioxin exposure), but also all workers having any type of skin condition such as chemical rash. The workers could have had no or negligible dioxin exposures, but they were included in the study as part of the heavily exposed group. This fact was revealed only by the careful reading of the published Suskind study.<\/li>\n<li>Further, Dr. Suskind utilized statistics on the skin conditions of workers compiled by a Monsanto clerical worker, without any independent verification.<\/li>\n<li>Dr. Suskind also covered-up the documented neurological damage from dioxin exposures. At Workers Compensation hearings, Suskind denied that the workers experienced any neurological health effects. In the Kemner, et al. v. Monsanto proceedings, however, it was revealed that Suskind had in his possession at the time examinations of the workers by Monsanto\u2019s physician, Dr. Nestman, documenting neurological health effects.<\/li>\n<li>In his later published study, Dr. Suskind denied the continuing documented neurological health effects suffered by the workers, falsely stating that symptoms \u201chad cleared.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>All of the Monsanto dioxin studies also suffer another fatal flaw. The purported \u201cdioxin unexposed\u201d control group was selected from other workers at the same Monsanto plant. An earlier court settlement revealed not only that these supposedly unexposed workers were exposed to dioxins, but also to other carcinogens. One of these carcinogens, para-amino biphenyl, was known by Monsanto to be a human carcinogen and it was also known that workers were heavily exposed.<\/li>\n<li>Another Monsanto study involved independent medical examinations of surviving employees by Monsanto physicians. Several hundred former Monsanto employees were too ill to travel to participate in the study. Monsanto refused to use the attending physicians reports of the illness as part of their study, saying that it would introduce inconsistencies. Thus, any critically ill dioxin-exposed workers with cancers such as Non-Hodgkins lymphoma (associated with dioxin exposures), were conveniently excluded from the Monsanto study.<\/li>\n<li>There are numerous other flaws in the Monsanto health studies. Each of these misrepresentations and falsifications always served to negate any conclusions of adverse health effects from dioxins.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Within days of learning that the Office of Enforcement had initiated a criminal investigation of Monsanto based on Jenkins\u2019 allegations, her job duties were withdrawn without warning. She was not given any assignments from August 30, 1990 until she was reassigned on April 8, 1992 to a job which was primarily administrative or clerical.<\/p>\n<p>According to a <a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.greens.org\/s-r\/078\/07-49.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">1994 report<\/a> on \u201cEPA\u2019s Phony Investigation of Monsanto,\u201d by William Sanjour, Policy Analyst, US Environmental Protection Agency, published in Rachel\u2019s Hazardous Waste News:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Dr. Jenkins filed a complaint with the Department of Labor claiming that she was being harassed for carrying out perfectly legal activities. The Labor Department investigated and found in Jenkins favor. The EPA appealed three times all the way up to the Secretary of Labor but each time the Department came down in favor of Jenkins finding that \u201cNone of the rationales [explaining her transfer] given by EPA \u2026 appear valid\u201d.<\/li>\n<li>In August of 1992, EPA quietly closed the criminal investigation without ever determining or even attempting to determine if the Monsanto studies were valid or invalid, let alone fraudulent. \u2026 There was no public announcement that the investigation was closed. Dr. Jenkins didn\u2019t learn about it until fifteen months later. Yet Monsanto knew within a few days of EPA\u2019s closing the case.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Why did Monsanto and the EPA go to such great lengths to hide the truth? It would have affected us all. EPA\u2019s brief criminal investigation of Monsanto included evidence that Monsanto knowingly contaminated Lysol with dioxin, even as the product was being marketed for cleaning babies\u2019 toys.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.greens.org\/s-r\/078\/07-49.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Dr. Jenkin\u2019s memo<\/a> also contained evidence that Lysol, a product made from Monsanto\u2019s Santophen, was contaminated with dioxin with Monsanto\u2019s knowledge. The manufacturer of Lysol was not told about the dioxin by Monsanto for fear of losing his business. Other companies using Santophen, who specifically asked about the presence of dioxin, were lied to by Monsanto.<\/p>\n<p>This is just one example of why we can\u2019t trust the EPA to stop Monsanto and Dow Chemical from poisoning us with dioxin.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/capwiz.com\/grassrootsnetroots\/issues\/alert\/?alertid=60525501\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">TAKE ACTION: <\/a>Call EPA\u2019s Fail! Tell the EPA You Won\u2019t Accept a Decision on 2,4-D Based on Dow Chemical\u2019s Biased Studies!<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/capwiz.com\/grassrootsnetroots\/issues\/alert\/?alertid=36102531\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">TAKE ACTION:<\/a> Tell USDA to Stop Agent Orange Corn!<\/p>\n<p>To learn more about what\u2019s wrong at the EPA, watch this video from the recent Occupy EPA protest:<\/p>\n<p><iframe frameborder=\"0\" height=\"480\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/0tcPC6q3bgU\" width=\"500\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><!--\nPagination for Multi-page posts\n~~~ --><br \/>\n<!--\nWidget Area: [Content Item] Below\n~~~ -->\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>New information reveals that EPA colluded with Monsanto\u2019s decades long cover up of the highly toxic chemicals Agent Orange toxin in their herbicide. April 13th, 2012 Blacklisted News 2,4-D and the dioxin pollution it creates are too dangerous to allow, period, but in the hands of bad actors like Monsanto and Dow Chemical the dangers &#8230; <a title=\"EPA Colluded in Coverup Of Decades Of Monsanto Poisoning\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/environment\/epa-colluded-coverup-decades-monsanto-poisoning-118281\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about EPA Colluded in Coverup Of Decades Of Monsanto Poisoning\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=416"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1038,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416\/revisions\/1038"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}