{"id":353,"date":"2011-06-16T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-16T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/?p=353"},"modified":"2024-04-24T14:31:28","modified_gmt":"2024-04-24T14:31:28","slug":"scientific-experts-fukushima-potentially-worse-20-chernobyl-governments-hiding-truth-28221","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/uncategorized\/scientific-experts-fukushima-potentially-worse-20-chernobyl-governments-hiding-truth-28221\/","title":{"rendered":"Scientific Experts: Fukushima Potentially Worse Than 20 Chernobyls \u2013 Governments Hiding The Truth"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n

Nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen tells Al Jazeera that the Fukushima nuclear disaster is potentially worse than 20 Chernobyl disasters as a series of scientific experts join him in chorus saying the that disaster in Japan is far worse than governments around the world are revealing to the public.<\/h3>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"World<\/a><\/p>\n

World Wide Radiation Cover Up \u2013 SHHH! We\u2019re keeping it from the stupid people<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Al Jazeera<\/strong><\/a> writes:<\/p>\n

\n

Fukushima: It\u2019s much worse than you think<\/h1>\n

Scientific experts believe Japan\u2019s nuclear disaster to be far worse than governments are revealing to the public.<\/h3>\n

\u201cFukushima is the biggest industrial catastrophe in the history of mankind,\u201d Arnold Gundersen, a former nuclear industry senior vice president, told Al Jazeera.<\/p>\n

Japan\u2019s 9.0 earthquake on March 11 caused a massive tsunami that crippled the cooling systems at the Tokyo Electric Power Company\u2019s (TEPCO) nuclear plant in Fukushima, Japan. It also led to hydrogen explosions and reactor meltdowns that forced evacuations of those living within a 20km radius of the plant.<\/p>\n

Gundersen, a licensed reactor operator with 39 years of nuclear power engineering experience, managing and coordinating projects at 70 nuclear power plants around the US, says the Fukushima nuclear plant likely has more exposed reactor cores than commonly believed.<\/p>\n

\u201cFukushima has three nuclear reactors exposed and four fuel cores exposed,\u201d he said, \u201cYou probably have the equivalent of 20 nuclear reactor cores because of the fuel cores, and they are all in desperate need of being cooled, and there is no means to cool them effectively.\u201d<\/p>\n

TEPCO has been spraying water on several of the reactors and fuel cores, but this has led to even greater problems, such as radiation being emitted into the air in steam and evaporated sea water \u2013 as well as generating hundreds of thousands of tons of highly radioactive sea water that has to be disposed of.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe problem is how to keep it cool,\u201d says Gundersen. \u201cThey are pouring in water and the question is what are they going to do with the waste that comes out of that system, because it is going to contain plutonium and uranium. Where do you put the water?\u201d<\/p>\n

Even though the plant is now shut down, fission products such as uranium continue to generate heat, and therefore require cooling.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe fuels are now a molten blob at the bottom of the reactor,\u201d Gundersen added. \u201cTEPCO announced they had a melt through. A melt down is when the fuel collapses to the bottom of the reactor, and a melt through means it has melted through some layers. That blob is incredibly radioactive, and now you have water on top of it. The water picks up enormous amounts of radiation, so you add more water and you are generating hundreds of thousands of tons of highly radioactive water.\u201d<\/p>\n

Independent scientists have been monitoring the locations of radioactive \u201chot spots\u201d around Japan, and their findings are disconcerting.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have 20 nuclear cores exposed, the fuel pools have several cores each, that is 20 times the potential to be released than Chernobyl,\u201d said Gundersen. \u201cThe data I\u2019m seeing shows that we are finding hot spots further away than we had from Chernobyl, and the amount of radiation in many of them was the amount that caused areas to be declared no-man\u2019s-land for Chernobyl. We are seeing square kilometres being found 60 to 70 kilometres away from the reactor. You can\u2019t clean all this up. We still have radioactive wild boar in Germany, 30 years after Chernobyl.\u201d<\/p>\n

[\u2026]<\/p>\n

Radiation monitors for children<\/strong><\/p>\n

Japan\u2019s Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters finally admitted earlier this month that reactors 1, 2, and 3 at the Fukushima plant experienced full meltdowns.<\/p>\n

TEPCO announced that the accident probably released more radioactive material\u00a0into the environment than Chernobyl, making it the worst nuclear accident on record.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, a nuclear waste advisor to the Japanese government reported that about 966 square kilometres near the power station \u2013 an area roughly 17 times the size of Manhattan \u2013 is now likely uninhabitable.<\/p>\n

The eight cities included in the report are San Jose, Berkeley, San Francisco, Sacramento, Santa Cruz, Portland, Seattle, and Boise, and the time frame of the report included the\u00a0ten weeks immediately following the disaster.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere is and should be concern about younger people being exposed, and the Japanese government will be giving out radiation monitors to children,\u201d Dr MV Ramana, a physicist with the Programme on Science and Global Security at Princeton University who specialises in issues of nuclear safety, told Al Jazeera.<\/p>\n

Gundersen points out that far more radiation has been released than has been reported.<\/p>\n

According to Gundersen, the exposed reactors and fuel cores are continuing to release microns of caesium, strontium, and plutonium isotopes. These are referred to as \u201chot particles\u201d.<\/p>\n

The hot particles on them can eventually lead to cancer.<\/p>\n

[\u2026]<\/p>\n

Source:<\/strong> Al Jazeera<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

As George Washington pointed out the amount of radioactive fuel at Fukushima dwarfs Chernobyl.<\/p>\n

\n

The Amount of Radioactive Fuel at Fukushima DWARFS Chernobyl<\/h1>\n

Science Insider noted<\/a> yesterday:<\/p>\n

\n

The Daiichi complex in Fukushima, Japan \u2026 had a total of 1760<\/span> metric tons of fresh and used nuclear fuel on site last year, according to a presentation by its owners, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco). The most damaged Daiichi reactor, number 3, contains about 90 tons of fuel, and the storage pool above reactor 4, which the Nuclear Regulatory Commission\u2019s (NRC\u2019s) Gregory Jaczko reported yesterday had lost its cooling water, contains 135 tons of spent fuel. The amount of fuel lost in the core melt at Three Mile Island in 1979 was about 30 tons; the Chernobyl reactors had about 180<\/span> tons when the accident occurred in 1986.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

[\u2026]<\/p>\n

However, the real numbers are even worse.<\/p>\n

Specifically, Tepco very recently transferred many more radioactive spent fuel rods into the storage pools. According to Associated Press, there were \u2013 at the time of the earthquake and tsunami \u2013 3,400 tons of fuel in seven spent fuel pools plus 877 tons of active fuel in the cores of the reactors.<\/p>\n

That totals 4,277<\/span> <\/strong><\/strong>tons of nuclear fuel at Fukushima.<\/p>\n

Which means that there is almost 24 times more nuclear fuel at Fukushima than Chernobyl.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Nature News points out that governments around the world new within days, if not hours, that nuclear melt downs occurred and dangerous levels of radiation were affecting the citizens of their nations.<\/p>\n

Instead of sharing the data with the public or the scientific community the information was kept under wraps.<\/p>\n

\n

Researchers call for nuclear data release<\/h1>\n

Trove of data from Fukushima and beyond could improve nuclear monitoring and benefit research.<\/h3>\n

Shortly after a massive tsunami struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant on 11 March, an unmanned monitoring station on the outskirts of Takasaki, Japan, logged a rise in radiation levels. Within 72 hours, scientists had analysed samples taken from the air and transmitted their analysis to Vienna, Austria <\/strong>\u2014 the headquarters of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), an international body set up to monitor nuclear weapons tests.<\/p>\n

It was just the start of a flood of data collected about the accident by the CTBTO\u2019s global network of 63 radiation monitoring stations. In the following weeks, the data were shared with governments around the world, but not with academics or the public.<\/strong> Now scientists working with the CTBTO on behalf of member states are calling for the data to be released, both to give other researchers an opportunity to use them, and to improve the network\u2019s performance.<\/p>\n

[\u2026]<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Those monitoring stations pick up other things as well. In the latest crisis, the network\u2019s sensitive radiation detection sensors were overwhelmed by radioisotopes streaming out of the damaged reactors at Fukushima Daiichi<\/strong>. Monitoring posts picked up isotopes such as iodine-131 and caesium-137 that were of concern to public health officials in other countries. Other radioisotopes such as niobium-95 and rubidium-103 were an early indicator of a meltdown<\/strong> inside one or more of the reactors.<\/p>\n

Under wraps<\/h2>\n

In keeping with its remit, the CTBTO shared data with designated scientific institutions in its member states, but not with other scientists or the public. Some members, such as Austria, subsequently released analyses based on the data, whereas others kept it private (see \u2018Radiation data from Japanese disaster starts to filter out\u2019<\/strong><\/a>).<\/p>\n

At a meeting held in Vienna from 8-10 June, scientists working with the CTBTO took a moment to reflect on the network\u2019s performance. Detection stations tracked the radiation from the accident, and atmospheric models worked well; yet questions remained. Why did the radiation spread so quickly to the Southern Hemisphere? Were ratios of xenon isotopes unusual because reactor physics are poorly understood, or because of equipment being miscalibrated? Answering such questions will help the network to trace future weapons tests. \u201cThere are things that are not understood fully, and [the data] should be made available to science,\u201d Weiss told scientists during a 9 June panel.<\/p>\n

[\u2026]<\/p>\n

Source:<\/strong> Nature News<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen tells Al Jazeera that the Fukushima nuclear disaster is potentially worse than 20 Chernobyl disasters as a series of scientific experts join him in chorus saying the that disaster in Japan is far worse than governments around the world are revealing to the public. \u00a0 World Wide Radiation Cover Up \u2013 … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1362,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353\/revisions\/1362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.alexanderhiggins.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}