Despite Multiple Methane And Oil Leaks From BOP and Sea Floor Feds Allow BP To Risk Uncontrolled BP Gulf Oil Spill Blowout
Posted by Alexander Higgins - July 19, 2010 at 1:47 pm - Permalink - Source via Alexander Higgins Blog|
|
Tweet | Share |
As the condition of BP’s leaking oil well continues to deteriorate rapidly BP has tried desperately to prevent the Federal Government from monitoring the sea floor for oil and methane leaks.
An anonymous government official said BP is not complying with the government’s demand for more monitoring of oil and methane leaks on the sea floor. BP spokesman Mark Salt declined to comment on the allegation, but said “we continue to work very closely with all government scientists on this.”
But yesterday the Feds finally moved in with their own ships and equipment to monitor the sea floor.
The Government almost immediately found oil leaking from the sea floor along with multiple methane leaks but did not immediately inform the public of their findings.
However, it didn’t take long before an “anonymous government official” leaked the those findings to the media.
CBS Channel 12 West Palm Beach reported oil seepage and methane detected around the well.
“Turns out there is a problem, engineers detected seepage and traces of methane in that area around the well.”
ABC News reported an anonymous government revealed “there may be leaking methane leaking” around the well.
Thad Allen says there is an unidentified seep close to the well… pressure testing will continue in 24 hour increments.
The AP quotes a government source who says there may be leaking methane.
Shortly after the Government’s discovery of the methane and oil leaks was leaked to the media Thad Allen sent a sharply worded letter to BP confirming the statements of the anonymous government official.
Given the current observations from the test, including the detected seep a distance from the well and undetermined anomalies at the well head, monitoring of the seabed is of paramount importance during the test period.
…
As a continued condition of the test, you are required to provide as a top priority access and coordination for the monitoring systems, which include seismic and sonar surface ships and subsea ROV and acoustic systems.When seeps are detected, you are directed to marshal resources, quickly investigate, and report findings to the government in no more than four hours.
I direct you to provide me a written procedure for opening the choke valve as quickly as possible without damaging the well should hydrocarbon seepage near the well head be confirmed.
The letter from Thad Allen revealed that the multiple statements BP has given to the media over the last few days claiming that there where no signs oil leaking from the sea floor were all outright lies.
Just hours before Thad Allen sent the letter BP gave the following statement during the Kent Well’s technical update which once again denied there was oil leaking from the sea floor.
On the well integrity test, the well remains shut in. the pressure does continue to build slowly in between one and two psi per hour and the pressure now is at 6,778 pounds per square inch.
So that trend continues as we would have forecasted in a scenario we talked about where some of the reservoir pressure has been depleted. So the trend continues to follow that expectation.
As you know we have a very extensive monitoring program underway. This includes regular seismic runs. This includes sonar activity. This includes monitoring with the remote operated vehicles, these robotic submarines as well as looking at temperature and noise information from the (inaudible) of air.
All of that data continues to show encouraging signs.
We’re not seeing any problems at this point of any issues with the shut in.
And we continue to review that data on a very regular basis with the government teams.
Thad Allen’s letter also indicates that the lack of well pressure is due to lack of well integrity which dismisses claims by BP that the low well pressure is due to reservoir depletion.
To add insult to injury BP also revealed that there are there are at least two sources of “bubbles” leaking from the BOP although BP claims they are not hydrocarbons.
And based on that we will – with these sort of results we’ll continue to leave the well shut in. So at this point it is encouraging. If you’ve been watching the video feeds you will have noticed in two different locations, we’ve seen a few bubbles.
I think as Kent mentioned yesterday this is not uncommon but clearly it’s important that we check everything very closely so we’re monitoring that. We have done some simple tests to determine if these bubbles appear to be from hydrocarbons or from something else.
CBS News reports that Government scientists are indeed worried that bubbles are methane.
CBS News correspondent Kelly Cobiella reports the stream of bubbles coming from the containment cap itself, which may contain high levels of methane, is also worrying [Government] scientists.
CBS News is also reporting that the Government has detected oil and methane surfacing 3 kilometers from the well head in addition to several anomalies on the top of the sea directly above the well head.
A seep near the oil well that had been spewing crude into the Gulf of Mexico is adding a new twist to a disagreement between BP and the government over what to do next now that the oil has been capped.
…
CBS News correspondent Kelly Cobiella reports the stream of bubbles coming from the containment cap itself, which may contain high levels of methane, is also worrying scientists.
In a statement released Monday morning, Allen said BP had provided the additional information and results from ongoing tests that he demanded in a tersely-worded letter to BP the day before.
“The federal science team got the answers they were seeking and the commitment from BP to meet their monitoring and notification obligations. Ongoing monitoring and full analysis of both the seepage and methane will continue in coordination with the science team,” said the statement.
…
On “the Early Show” this morning, Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change Carol Browner said that in addition to concern about the bubbles rising from the well head and the oil seepage detected three kilometers from the site, the government has an additional concern:
“One of our own boats, the NOAA Pisces boat, detected some anomalies at the top of the sea above the well head,” she told anchor Harry Smith.
…
The concern all along – since pressure readings on the cap weren’t as high as expected – was a leak elsewhere in the wellbore, meaning the cap may have to be reopened to prevent the environmental disaster from becoming even worse and harder to fix.
…
When asked about the seep and the monitoring, BP spokesman Mark Salt would only say that “we continue to work very closely with all government scientists on this.”
Over the weekend the Government made statements it would make BP open the cap and begin collecting oil but BP disagreed to comply with those orders.
When asked about the seep and the monitoring, BP spokesman Mark Salt would only say that “we continue to work very closely with all government scientists on this.”
The apparent disagreement began to sprout Saturday when Allen said the cap bottling up the oil would eventually be hooked up to a mile-long pipe to pump the crude to ships on the surface. But early the next day, BP chief operating officer Doug Suttles said the cap should shut the oil in until relief wells are finished.
That could be risky, reports Cobiella. With the oil held back, pressure is slowly building in the well bore and on the failed blowout preventer. If there’s a weak point, the pressure could make it worse.
To make matters worse there is now evidence that the condition of the Blowout Preventer is now beginning to deteriorate.
While monitoring the live BP oil spill multi ROV camera wall overnight I recorded several videos of a new oil leak in the Blowout Preventer.
Thad Allen has repeatedly given reassurances to the public that the cap would be opened to relieve any pressure immediately if there were any sign of loss of well integrity.
Yet despite overwhelming evidence that the integrity of both the well and the BOP has been compromised the Federal Government has decided to allow BP to keep the well closed a move that is all reward and no risk for BP.
Thad Allen agreed to allow the well to remain capped for at least another 24 hours in a statement issued earlier today to the press to clear up any ambiguity about what the Government tests found yesterday.
Yesterday I sent BP a letter stating that there were a number of unanswered questions about the monitoring systems they committed to as a condition of the US government extending the well integrity test. Last night a conference call between the federal science team and BP representatives was convened to discuss some specific issues, including the detection of a seep near the well and the possible observation of methane over the well.
…
Ongoing monitoring and full analysis of both the seepage and methane will continue in coordination with the science team.
I authorized BP to continue the integrity test for another 24 hours and I restated our firm position that this test will only continue if they continue to meet their obligations to rigorously monitor for any signs that this test could worsen the overall situation.
Is BP Hoping For An Underground Blowout?
That may seem like an odd question at first but for BP the fine stopped as soon as they capped the well.
BP argues bottom line is that no one want’s to see anymore oil leaking into the Gulf which is a valid argument.
“No one associated with this whole activity … wants to see any more oil flow into the Gulf of Mexico,” Doug Suttles, BP’s chief operating officer, said Sunday. “Right now we don’t have a target to return the well to flow.”
But as Don Van Nieuwenhuise points out the only way that Government will ever get accurate flowrate measurements is by reopening the well and capture all of the oil leaking from it.
“Thad Allen wants to do containment because they want to find out what the real flow rate was,” Don Van Nieuwenhuise, director of Petroleum Geoscience Programs at the University of Houston, said in an interview yesterday. “Unless they do something like that, they’ll almost never be able to prove what the true flow rate was.”
BP’s fine stopped the the day BP capped the well.
BP is not getting fined for the oil leaking through the sea floor because it is not being measured and to be frank there is no way to measure it.
Given the current condition of the well, which is leaking oil through the sea floor and leaking oil and methane from the BOP, the longer the well remains closed the higher the risk of an uncontrolled blowout.
So the bottom line is a blowout will only prevent the Government from being able to get an accurate measurement of the amount of oil.
What does oil leaking from cracks in the sea floor mean?
During a similar blowout that happened over 30 years ago during the IXTOC disaster an underground blowout occurred that led to several leaks from cracks in the seafloor.
Those leaks hindered the killing of the well using a single relief well but the well was eventually killed using two relief wells.
BP has continued to stonewall congress and by refusing to release the data it has about the sea floor leaks and the integrity of the wellbore even though BP was first ordered to release all data about the leaks and well integrity almost a month ago.
Still the confirmation that their is oil leaking from the sea floor near the well should really not come as a surprise.
The Government has been warning about the possibility for weeks and the Government has even release reports stating they knew about cracks in the sea floor since February.
Those reports in combination with released BP documents confirming an open hole in the well casing and collapsed rock around the well bore leads any to the logical conclusion that such leaks would occur on the sea floor.
While reports and videos of oil leaking from cracks in the sea floor have been making their way around the internet for months the acknowledgment by the Government that oil is leaking from the sea floor finally confirms that BP will run into problems that could prevent it from permanently capping the well.
The longer the well is closed the higher the chances that an all out underground blowout occurs which would further complicate BP’s efforts to permanently stop the leaking well.
The high concentration of methane around the well bore is a prelude to oil leaking from the same locations because it is easier for methane to escape through the cracks than it is for oil.
If the cap on the well isn’t opened soon it is highly likely that the oil that is now leaking some distance from the well will soon start leaking very close to the well and possibly from directly beneath the well casing itself.
The Federal Government has already considered this scenario and for that reason has announced it is exloring plans to install a permanent pipeline to capture the oil in the even that relief wells fail to stop the well.














Wall Street Banks Secretly Build The World's Largest Private Army
Chris Martenson: "We Are About To Have Another 2008-Style Crisis"
Headlines
MSM Blackout On NDAA Being Blocked As Unconsitutional
Hundreds Of Flight Attendants Fall Ill With Hair Falling Out
Official List Of Words Feds Monitor On Social Networking Sites
Occupy Protestor Loses Eye After Police Stun Grenade Peaceful Crowd
UN Ambassador: "No Exaggeration - Fate Of The World Depends On Fukushima Reactor 4”
Feds Buying Up All Surplus Ammo, Ordering Stores To Cease Sales?
MK Ultra 2012 - Cops Caught Mass Drugging Teens And Dropping Them At Occupy Minnesota
Flesh Eating Disease In Cocaine Found In New York, Los Angeles - Cocaine Supply Of Entire Nation May...
Explosions Destroy Saudi Oil Pipeline, Sends Oil Prices Soaring
Alex…has anybody tried consolidating the coordinates from the ROV screens..ie the geographical locations on the seep videos….?
We could perhaps all jointly submit the information..the numbers…I could take it and plot the locations of the seeps and overlay the locations against all the different maps of various systems in the Gulf.
The information is right in front of us…perhaps we should seize the opportunity and utilize it..if people haven’t started to already.
On another note.
the analysis of the oil.
nitrogen 1900 ppms
methanol <20 ppms
H2S .435%/wt
Nitrogen hydrates are the hydrate they are encountering…probably a little methane hydrate too..
the gradients for the release of hydrates are dependent on pressure, temperature, chemical "inhibitors " in the oil…salt in this case…
The release rate is proportional to the amount of methanol in the fluid . When it erodes into hydrate layers, it releases them at a fast rate.
anyway..I wrote an absolutely massive article on some other things I just learned that should bridge some of the major gaps in any news we are getting.
Keep up the great work.
http://mentaljudo.blogspot.com/2010/07/whats-inside-doughnut.html
Alex, Great website. I was worried when BP wanted to cap the well as this would force the oil into the upper layers above rock formation (10 to 300/500 m below seafloor. The warm oil will vaporise more hydrates into methane gas which will seep upwards causing an uncontrollable irreversible change to the sub-seabed conditions. Please see my article to understand better at this site
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/19/4704785-the-high-risk-of-capping-bps-gushing-well-from-the-top
Great work, thanks for helping to keep our environment safe.
[...] Potential BP Gulf Oil Spill Blowout great article from Alexander Higgins, by way of Katy’s Exposure… [...]
Don’t ya just love the term “leak?” As in oil ‘leak’. A ‘leak’ is when I take, or you take a ‘leak’. Can you compare that ‘leak’ to the oil ‘leak’?
Now, ‘gusher’, that’s different and makes more sense when referred to the oil ‘leak’. Should be oil ‘gusher’ not oil ‘leak’.
How many times have you gone to relieve yourself and said “Excuse me, I’ve got to take a ‘gusher’?
Well, probably a few of you. But you get the picture.
So stop referring to the oil ‘gusher’ as the oil ‘leak’.
Fore more on the oil ‘gusher’ follow this leak, rather, link…
http://www.theamericansheeple.com/specialpublication.html
[...] Despite Multiple Methane And Oil Leaks From BOP and Sea Floor Feds Allow BP To Risk Uncontrolled BP …. July 19th, 2010 | Category: Uncategorized | Comments are closed | [...]
[...] [...]
Noted, silverado and thank-you. Goggles ct gloves.
How to prepare for the future environment.
Please give your ideas/input.
“The riser is totally irrelevant,” Simmons stressed, adding “and there’s no way to cap the open hole.” He explained that BP continues to deny the open hole exists and theorizes the continuing flow of oil into the Gulf is really just the residue from what has already been spilled during the first 90 days of the disaster.
Oil expert Simmons insists ‘20 million people are entrapped in harm’s way’
http://www.johnkaminski.info/pages/the_next_chapter/print/they_are_still_lying_about_the_oil_disaster.htm
Isaac has come up with a brillant idea with the rovs. While on Google Earth I saw this webcam site with cams set up all over the World. I would love to see a livecam wall that I could watch how the skies in different countries are effected. The in-situ burning in itself is air pollution on a grand scale. The coming toxic rain is all a matter of when. And when the seafloor implodes or explodes I cannot imagine what the atmosphere will be like. I can imagine I just cannot come to grips with the enormity of the situation. And yet, I must use the knowledge I have gained from your site and Isaac’s site to prepare.
But! What to do? How to proceed? I am thinking digging a large rain collection cistern that collects rain until rain becomes toxic. then cover cistern I am also freeze drying many fruits. Storing spring water. Can goods. But..the air How will we breathe? All thoughts on the subject will be most appreciated.
Tid bit..don’t know what to think but, the other night I and a friend went to the car wash as my friend was washing truck I noticed that there were no bugs flying around the lights.There is a good cross section of light types (Walmart,billboard, car wash etc.) it is a hot summer night I am in the Ozarks (land o bugs) and yet..no bugs! No mayflies, june bugs, mantis, moths. No bugs.
Corexit was originally a pesticide to kill plants and insects before it was used as dispersant against oil. It is a threat to humans especially children who have naturally lower resistance against toxics.
“2-butoxyethanol (in Corexit) is the same chemical that is so hazardous to the health of men who spray paint cars. Recently I have spoken with two workers of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill cleanup who say they are loosing their eye-sight. Said someone unrelated to this issue, “When I was a teenager & borrowed a guy’s garage to spray paint my car, he gave me a helpful hint: The eyes and the cuticles are the main entrance into the body for 2-butoxyethanol. Wear your eye goggles and your chemically retardant gloves… very important.”
http://www.valdezlink.com/evos/editor.htm
[...] does oil leaking from cracks in the sea floor mean? Posted on July 20, 2010 by WeCogitate http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/ This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged Cover-up /Deception/ Propaganda, Currrent [...]
First preparation step is a calm threat analysis. How far are you from the spill affected areas? Is the immediate danger the gas or the contaminated rain? What about your family, friends? If you think that gas masks or goggles are going to save you, you are wrong. The real danger are the effects of long time exposure. It is like living in a slightly radioactive area. Although you might not die immediately, it might have serious long term consequences for both you and your family. Avoid rain contact with skin or eyes. Keep children indoors, think about the safety of windows, doors and chimney. Do you use open fire in the house? Methane and Hydrogen Sulfide are highly flammable. And in the end there is also the question whether your job and living place is worth risking life long respiratory problems or even genetic birth defects of your children. I'm afraid that relying only on gas masks and goggles might give you a false image of safety.
Thought you all might be interested in this comment from TheOILDrum.com:
“SRSrocco2 on July 20, 2010 – 9:51am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Parent subthread | Comments top SPECULATION ON BP and GOVT COVERUP
Taking a more indirect approach….James Howard Kunstler (who has a link) wrote in his new blog on Monday “WHAT IF HE IS RIGHT”? This is in reference to Matt Simmons extreme allegations of an open hole in the wellbore spewing 120,000 barrels a day. Again, I am still not sure of what to make of it, but I would like to offer some speculation as to why there might be a coverup.
The US ECONOMY is on the brink of a collapse. This is my field of knowledge. Because we have a falling EROI, the US Economy has been put on life support by money printing, phantom wealth in the form of electronic digits, and trillions of dollars in worthless Derivatives.
If anyone has any knowledge of the wonderful world of INTEREST RATE SWAPS, you will realize it is a PONZI SCHEME to keep the cost of debt down. Greece is a perfect example. When they were having trouble with their interest rates, JP MORGAN and others stepped in and sold them boatloads of INTEREST RATE SWAPS. This kept their interest rates low (artifically) to allow them to function in the EUROPEAN UNION. But as all Ponzi Schemes come to an end…..GREECE BLEW UP and their interest rates skyrocketed starting last year and now have left the country in a complete mess. The use of INTEREST RATE SWAPS is everywhere as it is the largest percentage of the hundreds of trillions of dollars of notional Derivatives out there.
There has been speculation that BP has a boatload of DERIVATIVES on and off their balance sheet much like LEHMAN BROTHERS. If BP goes under, it causes another chain reaction disaster in the Global Financial Meltdown. Furthermore, if the GULF OIL DISASTER is as Simmons states, then its nothing but bad news for the US ECONOMY and Dollar.
Everyone has stampeded into the safety of the US TREASURY MARKET. Basically US Treasuries are IOUS backed by the full faith of the US GOVT. With a falling EROI and an economy based on a high EROI, there is no way this US DEBT will be paid back. At some point in time the WHOLE SCH-BANG comes tumbling down just like the former USSR.
This might be the very reason why SIMMONS allegations seem so extreme compared to the US GOVT and BP. If it is true that there is an open hole spewing 120,000 barrels a day, its game over for the USA. Its a BARN BURNER.
In that vein…I do hope Mr. Simmons is incorrect.”
Wow.
Chemicals to be aware of:
Hydrogen Sulfide H2S
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMvC5ydx_PQ
Benzene C6H6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK2SlPCY7m8
Methylene Chloride (aka DCM) CH2Cl2
http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9926060
Methane CH4
Maybe a valve, @ the cap, to release some pressure might “do the trick”! It’s kind of weird, that a trans-national corporation like bp, wouldn’t know about “drilling into mud/oil volcanos”! Like it’s been, “some kind of mis-take”. Just an “accident”, now with all the methane.(Maybe just give bp, to another party, who’s good @ being ‘the victims’….)
I’ve heard that, “this hasn’t happened before”!
Yet, just a few hundred miles southwest, & there’s Veracuz, Mexico, with the IXTOC Disaster, some 20 years ago, & NO ONE (Supposedly.) KNOWS THIS! It’s time, to “hold bp FULLY RESPONSIBLE”. With “You’re GUILTY, Until Proven I-N-N-O-C-E-N-T”! And NOT, the other way around…….
And b.t.w. The fishermen in the bayou, all say that “there’s been oil seeps, for over 20 years!” Some say that there’s over 40,000 gallons leak into the gulf, every year. So,
“where are the maps/locations of THOSE ‘leaks’”? (Maybe they just, ‘got Bigger’!)
And remember what the military said; “Big oil, has better technology than we do”! (So, they’d KNOW, “what they’re doing, too?”) And besides, “if there’s oil eating microbes, already in the oil, then WHY, use the corexit in the 1st place”?!? (To save’em from paying $4300.00 per barrel recovered?) Maybe this guy, knows something;
http://www.thegic.org/profiles/blogs/asphalt-volcano-amp-bp?xg_source=activity
(And b.t.w. The Real Reason for Climate Change, is NOT, because of ‘all the oil burning’, but because of a BRIGHTER FULL MOON!)
Check out this link, for proof;
http://www.360cities.net/image/full-moon-at-camas-rubha-a-mhurain-scotland#482.08,-20.30,20.1 & here, for more proofs;
http://www.360cities.net/search/full-moons
As, “Since WHEN, does a full moon, mimic the sun”? (Hint; “It’s what the chemtrail program, is all about”! And the ‘burning of the oil’, only exaspurbates the real problem. H-E-A-T !)
And also, “If you’re going to say, that this is the Wolfmoon, all I can say, is that the wolfmoon, only happens, in january”;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_moon
Enough of this BP (brown, Browner, BROWNED PELICAN) BS (Bush Shadow) Obamanation! FIRE in The HOLE!! NOW!!!
[...] Despite Multiple Methane And Oil Leaks From BOP and Sea Floor Feds Allow BP To Risk Uncontrolled BP …blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2010/07/19/despite-multiple-methan… sent by Sparrows since 23 hours 22 minutes, published about 2 hours 39 minutes As the condition of BP’s leaking oil well continues to deteriorate rapidly BP has tried desperately to prevent the Federal Government from monitoring the sea floor for oil and methane leaks. An anonymous government official said BP is not complying with the government’s demand for more monitoring of oil and methane leaks on the sea floor. BP spokesman Mark Salt declined to comment on the allegation, but said “we continue to work very closely with all government scientists on this.” But yesterday the Feds finally moved in with their own ships and equipment to monitor the sea floor. The Government almost immediately found oil leaking from the sea floor along with multiple methane leaks but did not immediately inform the public of their findings. However, it didn’t take long before an “anonymous government official” leaked the those findings to the media.tags: uncontrolled blowout, sea floor, whistleblower 1 commentscategory: Abuse of Power/Corruption karma: 132 comments#1 Fracking unbelievable and beyond stupid! I have to assume that, by allowing this cap, Admin officials are going to be handsomely rewarded by BP's owners for making it impossible to ever derive the total amount of oil that's spewed into the Gulf, hence limiting BP's financial liability. If this capped contraption blows out, the whole Obama team ought to be sent to a gulag in Siberia.written by Alydar since 1 time 27 minutes Login if you want to write comments. Or register aquí. Who has buzzed this?user buzzes: 14, anonymous buzzes: 2SparrowsMike5000skeptic-alhelptheimmoralunsinkmollyProgressiveGeekruffburrpatnkansaskladnerPoliticsPluscolinjameskjlovellAlydarrondobbs 1 Who has negatively flagged this story? var update_voters=true; trackbacks(no trackbacks) según Technorati [...]
Alex, this is urgent. Is the original BOP still falling over? Has it's angular decent progressed since you announced your findings a few weeks ago?
Susan, Silverado left out a MAJOR organ that needs protection in a hazerdous environment where chemicles are present. It has to do with the main blood/gas interface in the human body. By the way, are you familar with a former Russian who was known by the name of Leon Trotsky? He coined a phrase for a certain class of people, he referred to them as usefull _ _ _ _ _ s? PT Barnum (US) later made use of such people, more from a financial perspective though. With some research, you may discover my meaning.
Looks as if Matt Simmons is correct in his assumptions.
The plotted site of the Macondo well blowout is 28.736628°N 88.365997°W
That is where the site of the believed oil leak and capping that has gained much fanfare.
But through an investigation of my own using widely available technology, I have found that there is a cluster of ships that are supposed to be involved with the operation that for an unknown reason are approx 7-9 miles away from the reported coordinates of the reported site.
Ships consisting of HILDA LAB, PAT TILLMAN, SEACOR RIGOROUS, FORTE, HOS SUPER H, HOS IRON HORSE, HOS CENTERLINE, LA CHEVAL, HOS STRONGLINE, to name a few, are anchored at a coordinate of 28.6987n, 88.4262w.
As I said earlier these ships are approx 7-9 miles away from the “main spill site”.
Why are all of these ships, most of which were publicized as response vessels in this spill, 7-9 miles away from the coordinates of the “spill site”.
Matt Simmons, as most already know, has been pontificating that the well we are all shown in the live feeds IS NOT the source of the main spill, and there is an open gusher about 8- 10 miles away.
The evidence I have found, with widely available technology, seem to lend itself to a POSSIBILITY of Mr Simmons being correct.
Anyone who wants to check up on this can fact check my info @ http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/default.aspx?zoom=10&mmsi=636014465¢erx=-88.23762¢ery=28.56287#. Guiding the mouse over the two areas will give you the coorinates in the lower left corner. You can research the ships I have mention by google.
Wake up people!!! We are being lied to!!! The truth will be told, we might just have to find it ourselves.
Experts: Health Hazards in Gulf Warrant Evacuations (Check Democracy Now)
When Louisiana residents ask marine toxicologist and community activist Riki Ott what she would do if she lived in the Gulf with children, she tells them she would leave immediately. “It’s that bad. We need to start talking about who’s going to pay for evacuations.”
In 1989, Ott, who lives in Cordova, Alaska, experienced firsthand the devastating effects of the Exxon Valdex oil disaster. For the past two months, she’s been traveling back and forth between Louisiana and Florida to gather information about what’s really happening and share the lessons she learned about long-term illnesses and deaths of cleanup workers and residents. In late May, she began meeting people in the Gulf with symptoms like headaches, dizziness, sore throats, burning eyes, rashes and blisters that are do deep, they’re leaving scars. People are asking, “What’s happening to me?”
She says the culprit is almost two million gallons of Corexit, the dispersant BP is using to break up and hide the oil below the ocean’s surface. “It’s an industrial solvent. It’s a degreaser. It’s chewing up boat engines off-shore. It’s chewing up dive gear on-shore. Of course it’s chewing up people’s skin. The doctors are saying the solvents are making the oil worse.”
Senior EPA Analyst: “Government [Agencies] Have Been Sock Puppets for BP In This Cover Up” (Check Truth-Out.org)
I have pointed out that dispersant Corexit is extremely toxic to people. The senior policy analyst at the EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response – and former the EPA ombudsman’s chief investigator – agrees, telling Democracy Now today:
>Corexit is one of a number of dispersants, that are toxic, that are used to atomize the oil and force it down the water column so that it’s invisible to the eye. In this case, these dispersants were used in massive quantities, almost two million gallons so far, to hide the magnitude of the spill and save BP money. And the government—both EPA, NOAA, etc.—have been sock puppets for BP in this cover-up. Now, by hiding the amount of spill, BP is saving hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars in fines, and so, from day one, there was tremendous economic incentive to use these dispersants to hide the magnitude of the gusher that’s been going on for almost three months.
***
>We have people, wildlife—we have dolphins that are hemorrhaging. People who work near it are hemorrhaging internally. And that’s what dispersants are supposed to do. EPA now is taking the position that they really don’t know how dangerous it is, even though if you read the label, it tells you how dangerous it is. And, for example, in the Exxon Valdez case, people who worked with dispersants, most of them are dead now. The average death age is around fifty. It’s very dangerous, and it’s an economic—it’s an economic protector of BP, not an environmental protector of the public.
***
>Who saves money by using these toxic dispersants? Well, it’s BP. But then the next question—I’ve only seen one article that describes it—who owns BP? And I think when you look and see who owns BP, you find that it’s the majority ownership, a billion shares, is a company called BlackRock that was created, owned and run by a gentleman named Larry Fink. And Vanity Fair just did recently an article about Mr. Fink and his connections with Mr. Geithner, Mr. Summers and others in the administration. So I think what’s needed, we now know that there’s a cover-up. Dispersants are being used. Congress, at least three Congress folks—Congressman Markey, Congressman Nadler and Senator Mikulski—are on the case. And I think the media now has to follow the money, just as they did in Watergate, and tell the American people who’s getting money for poisoning the millions of people in the Gulf.
***
>The sole purpose in the Gulf for dispersants is to keep a cover-up going for BP to try to hide the volume of oil that has been released and save them hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars of fines. That’s the purpose of using the dispersants, not to protect the public health or environment. Quite the opposite.
I have also previously pointed out the similarities between the government’s handling of 9/11 and the oil gusher. Kaufman gives some insight about the parallels:
>[Question] You’ve made comparisons between Corexit, the use of Corexit and hiding BP’s liability, and what happened at Ground Zero after the attacks of September 11th, Hugh Kaufman.
>[Kaufman] Yeah, I was one of the people who—well, I did. I did the ombudsman investigation on Ground Zero, where EPA made false statements about the safety of the air, which has since, of course, been proven to be false. Consequently, you have the heroes, the workers there, a large percentage of them are sick right now, not even ten years later, and most of them will die early because of respiratory problems, cancer, etc., because of EPA’s false statements.
>And you’ve got the same thing going on in the Gulf, EPA administrators saying the same thing, that the air is safe and the water is safe. And the administrator misled Senator Mikulski on that issue in the hearings you talked about. And basically, the problem is dispersants mixed with oil and air pollution. EPA, like in 9/11—I did that investigation nine years ago—was not doing adequate and proper testing. Same thing with OSHA with the workers, they’re using mostly BP’s contractor. And BP’s contractor for doing air testing is the company that’s used by companies to prove they don’t have a problem.
[...] Despite Multiple Methane And Oil Leaks From BOP and Sea Floor Feds Allow BP To Risk Uncontrolled BP … [...]
[...] inches from the cap. Throughout, BP has claimed this isn’t a problem, that the seepage is unrelated to the Macondo Well, but many scientists would disagree: Robert Bea, an industrial engineer at the University of [...]
At the risk of asking a stupid question… how far is far enough away(from danger of gas and/or toxic rain
[...] Feds find Multiple Methane , Oil Leaks From BOP and Sea Floor [...]
[...] the rest of this great post here Comments (0) Posted in Oil Spill [...]
[...] Read more… [...]
[...] demand than the massive scale of this catastrophe.As everyday there is more bad news. Find a good write-up here by blogger Alex Higgins. Before any of this comes as a surprise to you I recommend to read my earlier BP Spill Reminders. [...]
[...] Despite Multiple Methane And Oil Leaks From BOP and Sea Floor Feds Allow BP To Risk Uncontrolled BP … Postscript: Self-described “petroleum industry geohazards engineer” BK Lim has picked up the conspiracy theory mantle from Simmons, claiming there were three leaking wells. We haven’t read Lim’s statements, and so offer no comment on his credibility. Alexander Higgins is a Senior NJ ASP.Net Developer. If you want the latest buzz, analysis, and news without the snooze, visit his comprehensive work at Alexander Higgins Blog. var linkwithin_site_id = 557381; linkwithin_text='Related Articles:' Enter Your Email To Receive Our Daily Newsletter [...]
[...] Despite Multiple Methane And Oil Leaks From BOP and Sea Floor Feds Allow BP To Risk Uncontrolled BP … Follow @IntelHub Join to Receive Exclusive Intel Hub News Alerts and Podcasts /* [...]
[...] Despite Multiple Methane And Oil Leaks From BOP and Sea Floor Feds Allow BP To Risk Uncontrolled BP… [...]