The Amount Of Neurotoxin Pesticide Corexit Sprayed By BP Tops 1 Million Gallons
Posted by Alexander Higgins - June 5, 2010 at 6:56 am - Permalink - Source via Alexander Higgins Blog
BP’s latest oil spill response update for June 4th says the total amount of the dispersant used in the Gulf of Mexico more than 1,021,000 gallons.
But what most people don’t know is that the active ingredient of the toxic chemical dispersant, which is up to 60% by volume, being sprayed by BP to fight the Gulf oil spill is a neurotoxin pesticide that is acutely toxic to both human and aquatic life, causes cancer, causes damage to internal organs such as the liver and kidneys simply by absorbing it through the skin and may cause reproductive side effects.
In fact the neurotoxin pesticide that is lethal to 50% of life in concentrations as little as 2.6 parts per million has been banned for use in the UK since 1998 because it failed the UK “Rocky shore test” which assures that the dispersant does not cause a “significant deleterious ecological change” – or to put that in layman’s terms it can kill off the entire food chain.
Corexit has also earned the highest EPA warning label for toxicity which means the effects of the toxic chemicals to the eye are corrosive resulting in irreversible destruction of ocular tissue and other tissue with corneal involvement along with an burning that can persist for more than 21 days and effects to human skin are corrosive resulting in tissue destruction into the dermis and/or scarring.
Corexit was widely used after the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill and according to a literature review performed by the group the Alaska Community Action on Toxics was later linked with widespread long lasting health impacts in people including respiratory, nervous system, liver, kidney and blood disorders.
The “Human Health Hazards” are said to be “Chronic” for Corexit EC9527A according to the EPA.
So What Are These Dispersants Made Of That Makes Them Such a Powerful Neurotoxin Pesticide?
The main ingredients of Corexit is 2-Butoxyethanol which can make up to 60% of the dispersant and is known to be toxic to blood, kidneys, liver, and the central nervous system (CNS).
2-Butoxyethanol is also known to cause cancer, birth defects and has been found to cause genetic mutations and is a delayed chronic health hazard as well as an environmental hazardous material
Corexit also contains Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Mercury, and Cyanide.
How effective is Corexit in dispersing Gulf crude?
Corexit 9500 is only 54.7% effective and Corexit 9527A is 63.4% effective in dispersing the crude oil found off the shores of South Louisiana.
BP has sprayed both Corexit 9500 and Corexit 9527 into the Gulf of Mexico to disperse the oil both of which have been banned in the UK since 1998 for failure to pass the Rocky Shores Test.
By BP’s own admission Corexit has the potential for bioaccumulation meaning it has the potential to accumulate in the tissues of organism beginning with the first organism in a food chain.
Why allow the use of these toxic dispersants?
Well the EPA has ordered BP to stop using the dispersants but BP has refused
Instead BP replied with its justification for using Corexit which the EPA responded to saying BP’s response “lacked sufficient analysis and focused more defending your initial decision” .
In general, the EPA justifies the use of dispersants because they are less toxic than oil and the cause less of an environment impact that oil along the coastline calling dispersants an environmental trade off which is the lesser of two evils.
However the choice of using Corexit contradicts both of those justifications.
Corexit is lethal in as little as 2.6 parts per million where oil is lethal in 11 parts per million meaning that Corexit is over 4 times more toxic than oil.
Furthermore scientific studies show that oil dispersed with Corexit is 11 times more lethal than oil alone.
In fact the study referenced showed that crude oil was lethal at 4250 parts per million to killifish but combination of oil mixed with Corexit was lethal in as little as 317.7 ppm.
“Dispersed oils were more toxic than crude oils,” noted the report.
The other justification of lessening the environmental impact along the shoreline doesn’t hold up either as the reason Corexit was banned in the UK is because it was in fact shown to have a “significant deleterious ecological change” on the shoreline.
The fact Corexit is 4 times as toxic as oil and up to 11 times as toxic when combined with oil it literally makes no sense to allow the use of such a toxic chemical that can “delete” the ecological systems along the Gulf coast.
A report in the journal Environmental Toxicology a decade ago concluded that lethality levels in “dispersed oil combinations were significantly more toxic to these organisms than .. crude oil.” Another study, this time of snails and amphipods reached exactly the same conclusion.
What are the long term effects of Corexit?
The EPA has stated over and over that the long term effects of the use of Corexit are unknown yet there is plenty of data documenting the long term effects on humans (see below).
Further making the EPA claims questionable is EPA’s Deepwater horizon response sites site clearly states that between 1 million and 2.5 million gallons of the neurotoxin pesticide Corexit was used in the 1979 ixtoc oil spill which makes it unfathomable that the EPA doesn’t know what the long term effects are of a chemical that has been widely used, and eventually banned in certain countries, over a period of 30 years.
To the contrary of the EPA’s statement scientific studies widely state Corexit 9527 has been tested extensively in the laboratory and used on oil spills since 1978 and a considerable number of toxicity reports exist concerning a wide variety of species.
So why does the Federal Government continue to tell us the the long term effects of the dispersant usage are unknown?
Why does the Federal Government continue to pretend like they know so little about the dispersant BP is being used?
What are the chemical components of the dispersants COREXIT 9500 and COREXIT 9527?
While the main ingredient which makes up to 60% of Corexit is reason enough to cause concern.
If you dig any more dirt on these let me know.
The components of COREXIT 9500 and 9527 are:
| CAS Registry Number | Chemical Name |
|---|---|
| 57-55-6 |
1,2-Propanediol
|
| 111-76-2 |
2-butoxy-Ethanol
|
| 577-11-7 |
Butanedioic acid, 2-sulfo-, 1,4-bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester, sodium salt (1:1)
|
| 1338-43-8 |
Sorbitan, mono-(9Z)-9-octadecenoate
|
| 9005-65-6 |
Sorbitan, mono-(9Z)-9-octadecenoate, poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) derivs.
|
| 9005-70-3 |
Sorbitan, tri-(9Z)-9-octadecenoate, poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) derivs
|
| 29911-28-2 |
2-Propanol, 1-(2-butoxy-1-methylethoxy)-
|
| 64742-47-8 |
Distillates (petroleum), hydrotreated light
|
| The have also been found to contain Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Mercury, and Cyanide among other heavy metals | |
What are the Chronic Health effects of Corexit?
Here are some of the highlights from the MSDS for the active ingredient (2-butoxyethanol) – of Corexit (up to 60% by volume)
- Severe over-exposure can result in death.
- MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Mutagenic for bacteria and/or yeast.
- The substance may be toxic to blood, kidneys, liver, central nervous system (CNS).
- Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage.
- Repeated exposure to highly (this) toxic material may produce general deterioration of health by an accumulation in one or many human organs.
- Hazardous in case of skin contact (permeator), of ingestion, of inhalation.
- May cause adverse reproductive effects (maternal and paternal fertility, fetoxicity)
- May cause birth defects (teratogenic)
- May cause cancer (tumorigenic)
- Penetrates intact skin easily and can cause systemic effects and central nervous system depression
- Inhalation: May cause irritation of the respiratory tract. May affect behavior (analgesia), behavior/central nervous system (headache, drowsiness, dizzness, stuttering, coma, weakness, ataxia, slurred speech, loss of coordination and judgement, personality changes, analgesia, blurred vision, tremor, excitement, somnolence), sense organs, the gastrointestinal tract (nausea, vomiting), metabolism (metabolic acidosis), respiration (dyspnea), urinary system (kidneys – hematuria, albuminuria, polyuria, oliguria, renal failure), liver (liver damage).
- Exposure to high vapor concentration may also cause corneal or lens opacity of the eyes.
- Ingestion: Causes gastrointestinal tract irritation with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. May affect behavior/central
nervous system (see inhalation), respiration (dyspnea), metabolism, cardiovascular system. - Chronic Potential Health Effects: Inhalation and Ingestion: Prolonged or repeated inhalation or ingestion may affect the liver, blood (changes in red blood cell count, pigmented or nucleated red blood cells, microcytosis with or without anemia, erythropenia, reticulocytosis, granulocytosis, leukocytosis), urinary system (kidneys -hematuria), metabolism (weight loss), endocrine system (spleen, thymus, pancreas). Prolonged or repeated inhalation of high concentrations may also cause lung hemmorrhage, congestion, bronchopneumonia.
- Classified in Canada as CLASS D-1A: Material causing immediate and serious toxic effects (VERY TOXIC).
- Classified in Canada as CLASS D-2B: Material causing other toxic effects (TOXIC)
What does the EPA say about the human health effects expected as a result of using the dispersants?
The EPA warning about human health affects says
People working with dispersants are strongly advised to use a half face filter mask or an air-supplied breathing apparatus to protect their noses, throats, and lungs, and they should wear nitrile or PVC gloves, coveralls, boots, and chemical splash goggles to keep dispersants off skin and out of their eyes. CDC provides more information on reducing occupational exposures while working with dispersants during the Gulf Oil Spill Response.
- Material Data Safety Sheet for Corexit 9500A (PDF) (11pp., 88 K, About PDF)
- Material Data Safety Sheet for Corexit 9527A (PDF) (11 pp., 132 K, About PDF)
Hasn’t BP switched over to a new less toxic version of Corexit
BP does claim that since it now using the more environmentally friendly version of Corexit it can not be verified whether or not the newer version contains 2-butoxyethanol or not.
BP and the manufacturer to date have refused to release a list of all of the chemicals contained in Corexit 9500 claiming that the ingredients are proprietary.
It is quite possible that 2-butoxyethanol or an even more hazardous substance is contained in Corexit 9500.
Corexit 9500, like Corexit 9527, also contains Propylene Glycol a substance generally recognized as safe for human consumption.
However, Propylene Glycol depletes oxygen from water 5 times greater than raw sewage and the massive amounts used in the BP Gulf oil spill could help contribute to dead zones in the Gulf where aquatic life can not survive.
What about the effects of Corexit on the oil spill clean up workers
During the Exxon Valdez another version of Corexit was used to clean up the oil.
CNN reports that the average life expectancy of workers who cleaned up the Exxon Valdez is 51 years old and most of those workers are now dead.
Watch this CNN video on how the dispersants are affecting the cleanup workers which claims that BP is putting its public image over the safety of those cleaning up the oil spill.
Since many like to click on just on sheet below and not see all of the information presented here in a single document, please see this publication by reputable scientists on sciencecorps.org which provides the information presented here but in much more technical detail all on a single page.
References:
- Deepwater Horizon Response Current Operations page
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/doctype/2931/53339/ - COREXIT 9527A Manufacturer MSDS retrieved 07/08/2010 from http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/posted/2931/Corexit_EC9527A_MSDS.539295.pdf
- COREXIT 9500 Manufacturer MSDS retrieved 07/08/2010 from http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/posted/2931/Corexit_EC9500A_MSDS.539287.pdf
- COREXIT 9500 EPA MSDS Product Data
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://www.epa.gov/emergencies/content/ncp/products/corex950.htm - COREXIT 9527A EPA MSDS Product Data
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://www.epa.gov/emergencies/content/ncp/products/corex952.htm - UK Dispersant Testing Guidelines
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://www.cefas.co.uk/publications/techrep/tech102.pdf - Act For Climate Justice*
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://www.actforclimatejustice.org/2010/05/exclusive-no-toxicity-tests-on-bp%E2%80%99s-dispersant/
*Information from this source verified using other resources above. - The BP Spill, litigation, and health dangers from Pesticides
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://www.archive.org/details/TheBpSpillLitigationAndHealthDangersFromPesticides – Audio file of the radio broadcast 27 MB MP3 - Pesticide Database Listing for Corexit – retrieved 01/05/2010 from http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Detail_Product.jsp?REG_NR=00892800006&DIST_NR=008928
- Pesticide Listing For 2-Butoxyethanol (Corexit Main Ingredient) retrieved 06/07/2010 from http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Detail_Chemical.jsp?Rec_Id=PC35051
- Additional Pesticide Listing Showing the uses for 2-Butoxyethanol (Corexit Main Ingredient) are as Fungicide, Microbiocide, Solvent, Adjuvant retrieved 06/07/2010 from http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Detail_Chemical.jsp?Rec_Id=PC35051
- Neurotoxin Listing For 2-Butoxyethanol (Corexit Main Ingredient) from NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc a research project published by the Minnesota School of Medicine retrieved 06/07/2010 from http://www.neuroassist.com/Neurotoxins.htm
- EPA Toxicity Warning Labels
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Docs/ref_products.html#EPAWarning - The Watering Hole
Resource used to find list of more information about Corexit
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://tpzoo.wordpress.com/2010/05/07/the-watering-hole-may-7-and-now-the-chemical-spill/ - The Science Blogs
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://scienceblogs.com/speakeasyscience/2010/05/a_lethal_concentration.php - COMPARATIVE TOXICITY OF TWO OIL DISPERSANTS, SUPERDISPERSANT-25
AND COREXIT 9527, TO A RANGE OF COASTAL SPECIES
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://publicfiles.dep.state.fl.us/DEAR/Oil%20Spill/Bioremediation%20and%20Dispersant%20Literature/Toxicity%20of%20Superdispersant-25%20and%20Corexit%209527.pdf - 2-butoxyethanol Material Safety Data Sheet
retrieved 05/06/2010 from http://www.sciencelab.com/xMSDS-2_Butoxyethanol-9923187 - Stone Prep MSDS
Contains additional state safety data on 2-butoxyethanol
retrieved 05/06/2010 from http://www.thisoldgrout.com/msds/stoneprep.pdf - TOXICITY OF SOUTH LOUISIANA CRUDE OIL, ALASKAN NORTH SLOPE CRUDE OIL AND DISPERSANT COREXIT 9500 TO GULF KILLIFISH, WHITE SHRIMP, AND EASTERN OYSTER
retrieved 06/05/2010 from http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-1113103-122552/unrestricted/Liu_thesis.pdf - Monitoring biodegradation of creosote in soils using radiolabels, toxicity tests, and chemical analysis
retrieved on 06/05/2010 from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/71006506/abstract - Oil and dispersed oil toxicity to amphipods and snails
retrieved on 06/05/2010 from http://bit.ly/aTruF6 - BP response to EPA on why it will continue to use Corexit retrieved 07/08/2010 from http://www.epa.gov/bpspill/dispersants/5-21bp-response.pdf
- Dispersants Approved in UK and Reason Corexit Was Removed from List in 1998 retrieved 07/08/2010 from http://www.marinemanagement.org.uk/protecting/pollution/documents/approval_approved_products.pdf
- Washington Post Reports BP Using both Corexit 9500 and Corexit 9527 retrieved 07/08/2010 from http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=382521
- BP’s Response To The EPA Directive To Stop Using Corexit retrieved 07/08/2010 from http://www.epa.gov/bpspill/dispersants/5-21bp-response.pdf
- EPA Response To BP’s refusal to stop using Corext retrieved 07/08/2010 from http://www.epa.gov/bpspill/dispersants/Rainey-letter-052610.pdf
You can find more information on the toxicity of Corexit here, here and here.














Wall Street Banks Secretly Build The World's Largest Private Army
Chris Martenson: "We Are About To Have Another 2008-Style Crisis"
MSM Blackout On NDAA Being Blocked As Unconsitutional
Headlines
Hundreds Of Flight Attendants Fall Ill With Hair Falling Out
Official List Of Words Feds Monitor On Social Networking Sites
Occupy Protestor Loses Eye After Police Stun Grenade Peaceful Crowd
UN Ambassador: "No Exaggeration - Fate Of The World Depends On Fukushima Reactor 4”
Feds Buying Up All Surplus Ammo, Ordering Stores To Cease Sales?
MK Ultra 2012 - Cops Caught Mass Drugging Teens And Dropping Them At Occupy Minnesota
Flesh Eating Disease In Cocaine Found In New York, Los Angeles - Cocaine Supply Of Entire Nation May...
Explosions Destroy Saudi Oil Pipeline, Sends Oil Prices Soaring
BP = BIG PARASITES!! Killing the rest of us for their stupid profits??? This company might as well be the god-damned antichrist – every one of their CEOS, half of MMS and some in the EPA should be round up and SHOT – this is an environmental crime of UNBELIEVABLE proportions and is not only killing endangered and other soon to be endangered marine life – but apparently is killing humans and crops and, given the ocean’s currents, god knows how much it will disperse to kill the rest of us. This product is banned in Britain b/c it can wipe out whole ecosystems yet they BRITISH Petroleum are using it here??? THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!! Where are our troops when we need them?? Off fighting some stupid war in some sh-hole third world country??? FOR OIL??? The use of Corexit is a war against America FAR FAR worse than 9/11 – I’m sorry to raise that spectre, but this IS terrorism at its absolute worst and apparently with the aide and indifference of some in our own corporate infested government!!!
[...] The Amount Of Neurotoxin Pesticide Corexit Sprayed By BP Tops 1 Million Gallons [...]
[...] [...]
As of July 19th. More than
180 Million Gallons of korrEXIT
“Spilled” in the Methane Gulf.
How flammable is this Neuro-
Toxin?? Tied to MonSaton at
The Directors level. Carl
Casale, now chairman of Board
Of NalCO. With Monsanto since
1984. The other NalCo exec who
Also reps for BP. Incest in
The highest levels of corporate
GovMental shows intent to
Conspire, which is a High
Crime for elected officials
To accept Gifts from Contractors.
[...] [...]
[...] Hugh Kaufman, who tells us that NOAA and the EPA are covering up the lethal effects of the neurotoxin pesticide dispersants and lying about Gulf Oil Spill water samples to save BP billions of dollars in [...]
[...] [...]
This is bogus. Anyone who believes any of this pseudo-science should really read up on basic biochemistry. Corexit is largely composed of propylene glycol and 2-Butoxyethanol, which does not bio-accumulate. 2-Butoxyethanol is soap, people. It’s the main ingredient in most home cleaning solutions – you know, the kind that Americans use everyday and wash down their drains with their waste-water. Don’t believe me? Read this: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts118.html
Yes, its a chemical that can cause harm. But you know what else causes harm? Oil on the surface of the water! Its a lose/lose situation. In this case, people who are actually educated about chemicals made a call to use dispersant to reduce the risk to shorelines and wetlands. The tradeoff is that dispersant traps oil under water until it is naturally broken up by the ocean. There’s no perfect solution – using dispersant or not using it – either way wildlife dies. You can read more about the pros and cons and the decision to use one method vs. another in this report from the National Academy of Sciences: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11283
In any case, why is everyone filled with so much righteous indignation about the supposed evils of corexit instead of looking at their own personal behaviors and connection to the larger picture? Sure, Corexit is bad. So is OIL saturating a wetland. You know what else is bad? Burning oil! And throwing plastic away where it sits for hundreds of years leaching junk into the ecosystem or making its way into the food chain. Of course it’s harder to get all irate when we are to blame. It’s much easier to get upset in a situation like this when it’s more clear who the bad guys are (oil company, etc.) But the truth is that everyone drives cars! Everyone travels on vacation, heats their homes, cooks food, and buys cheap plastic stuff made on the other side of the world. Even if you don’t drive, do you have any idea how much stuff is made with petrochemicals? Chap stick. Bike helmets. Hospital equipment. Seat belts. Tennis shoes. You name it. Even the tree huggers who only eat organic food use untold amounts of oil when they buy organic blueberries from Chile in December.
So if everyone wants to be angry upset, lets all get angry and upset in a productive way. Instead of being lazy and finger pointing and fear mongering about dispersant, why don’t we take a look at our own consumption? Demand influences supply. If we reduce demand for oil and things made or transported by oil, guess what will happen?
Instead of worrying about the insignificant difference between damage caused by oil on top of the water or oil and some soap in the water, why not direct our focus on the question of why the demand for oil is so great that we are collectively willing to risk damaging all different ecosystems to fulfill our insatiable need to consume so much and throw so much away. Choose not to drive or fly anywhere on your next vacation. If you care about animals, don’t eat them. Grow your own vegetables. Don’t buy plastic. Make your own food and your own home-cleaning solutions. And learn as much as you can about science and industry so that you can separate real risk and real harm from bogus pseudo-science (like the info on this site).
[...] More about Corexit here: http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/… [...]
[...] Ja, meinVZ verlassen Doch nicht /* */ /* */ /* [...]
[...] The Amount Of Neurotoxin Pesticide Corexit Sprayed By BP Tops 1 Million Gallons [...]
[...] method fails as cleanup workers are hospitalized from vapors Gulf Oil Leaks Could Gush for Years The Amount Of Neurotoxin Pesticide Corexit Sprayed By BP Tops 1 Million Gallons 10 Things You Need (But Don’t Want) To Know About the BP Oil Spill Corexit is Killing the [...]
[...] many believe the break out of skin lesions in the Gulf may be attributed to BP’s use of the highly toxic dispersant Corexit, Jeffrey H. Toney the Dean of the College of Natural, Applied and Health Sciences at Kean [...]
[...] many believe the break out of skin lesions in the Gulf may be attributed to BP’s use of the highly toxic dispersant Corexit, Jeffrey H. Toney the Dean of the College of Natural, Applied and Health Sciences at Kean [...]
[...] kill method fails as cleanup workers are hospitalized from vaporsGulf Oil Leaks Could Gush for YearsThe Amount Of Neurotoxin Pesticide Corexit Sprayed By BP Tops 1 Million Gallons10 Things You Need (But Dont Want) To Know About the BP Oil SpillCorexit is Killing the GulfMassive [...]
[...] Ja, studiVZ jetzt verlassen Vergiss es /* */ /* */ /* [...]
Midge there are plenty of what would be good points. and there are some good suggestions that can be extracted from your post, but you fail to see, or at least to acknowledge the context of the society you’re addressing, and therefore, you’re blaming victims of ignorance and inability to think which has been largely INTENTIONALLY inflicted upon them by the very corporate powers and selfish, malicious, wealthy individuals who have conspired in myriad ways to keep people misinformed, uninformed, distracted, disinterested, duped and brainwashed in so many ways.
Furthermore, you yourself are either completely ignorant of the facts of these dispersants or are lying. If you’re lying it’s most likely because you have one form of self interest or another which you value over the health and safety of millions of people.
Can you please, please, please let us know why plain ol’ harmless “soap” in the form of Corexit has been banned in England and has such strong warnings in other countries including here in the US? Why is “soap” causing such strong and immediate reactions and results such as burning eyes and lungs, nausea and headaches when people are breathing near it or being near it? Also very nice of you to ignore all the other ingredients such as Cadmium and so forth aside from what you describe as soap.
I guess we should just ignore Riki Ott, this Kaufman dude from EPA and the numerous other scientists that have studied it in the past and warned against it the minute BP started to use it, as well as the very warnings and findings from it’s manufacturers and users? Yeah, it’s just fucking soap! We should just listen to “midge” whoever the fuck that is!
In a perfect world some computer detecting would identify your real name and have some way of tracking whether or not your lies or bullshit actually led anyone dismiss the danger and breathe or touch or ingest contaminated food or water whom otherwise would not have and if they had and it caused them damage you’d be held accountable. If it were found you knowingly lied and caused death or major harm to anyone and I were the judge and jury you’d be joining illustrious fellow prisoners on death row such as most of the Bush admin, much of the current one and most of the worlds corporate leaders and most involved in corporate media!
I don’t believe in the death penalty generally, especially in our current system with who ends up as the targets and why, but I DEFINITELY believe in it for people in great power that knowingly use power and, or, influence to cause or allow harm to masses of people!
[...] a top level EPA official has turned whistleblower and said the Federal Government is covering up the lethality of Corexit and lying about water samples to help save BP billions of dollars in [...]
[...] The Amount Of Neurotoxin Pesticide Corexit Sprayed By BP Tops 1 Million Gallons – 16,213 reads Gulf Oil Spill Leak Counter Note: NPR has now confirmed 2,100,000 gallons of oil leaking per day. That is 70,000 barrels per day or 1 Exxon-Valdez spill every 4 days. Blogroll [...]
[...] the rest of this great post here Comments (0) Posted in BP News [...]
[...] | While an EPA whistle blower has came forward and said the Government is lying about the lethal effects of Corexit and lying about water samples a large area of Gulf fishing waters have been reopened despite the [...]
[...] new chemical dispersant is being used in the cleanup effort — it’s toxic, it’s largely experimental, and [...]
[...] [...]
[...] Amount Of Neurotoxin Pesticide Corexit Sprayed By BP Tops 1 Million Gallons | Alexander Higgins Blog [...]
[...] en développant une autre technologie. Exemple : En ce moment BP diffuse du détergent (le corexit) pour dissoudre le pétrole qui fuit. Très bien, comme ça, en plus du pétrole, on se prend du [...]
[...] The Amount Of Neurotoxin Pesticide Corexit Sprayed By BP Tops 1 Million Gallons – 15,578 reads [...]
[...] 40%,http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100728/full/news.2010.379.html + Miljoenen liters corexit.http://blog.alexanderhigg(…)illion-gallons-1320/Keurig opgelost. We must guard against the aquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or [...]
[...] Corexit is a NEUROTOXIN. [...]
[...] [...]
[...] http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2010/06/05/amount-neurotoxin-pesticide-corexit-sprayed-bp-tops-1-mi… [...]
[...] Amount Of Neurotoxin Pesticide Corexit Sprayed By BP Tops 1 Million Gallons | Alexander Higgins Blog [...]
[...] Arsenico, Cadmio, Cromo, Mercurio… Aquí está todo lo que se ha publicado sobre el Corexithttp://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2010/06/05/amount-neurotoxin-pesticide-corexit-sprayed-bp-tops-1-mi…Fuente: BlogKamusLord JediCantidad de envíos: 1722Nivel de Aportación: 3424Iluminación: 4Fecha [...]
[...] Spreads Neuro-Toxins Throughout the Gulf http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2010/06/05/amount-neurotoxin-pesticide-corexit-sprayed-bp-tops-1-mi……what most people don’t know is that the active ingredient of the toxic chemical dispersant, [...]
[...] More… Most Recent Related Stories… Hungary sludge flood called 'ecological disaster'Hungary declared a state of emergency in three counties Tuesday after a flood of toxic red… $5 trillion: The cost each year of vanishing rainforestBritish scientific experts have made a major breakthrough in the fight to save the natural world… Panel: Transocean thwarts efforts to get documentsMembers of a federal panel investigating the cause of the Gulf of Mexico rig explosion and… The Big Secret Commercial Water Companies Hope You Never Discover…Bottled water has been falling out of public favor for years now, once people began to… rnum=Math.round(Math.random() * 100000); ts=String.fromCharCode(60); if (window.self != window.top) {nf=''} else {nf='NF/'}; document.write(ts+'script src="http://www.burstnet.com/cgi-bin/ads/ad17997a.cgi/v=2.3S/sz=300x250A/NZ/'+rnum+'/'+nf+'RETURN-CODE/JS/">'+ts+'/script>'
; [...]
[...] http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2010/06/05/amount-neurotoxin-pesti… [...]
[...] [...]
Man I dont know, it’s too early to be able to tell but somebody can get super high futures odds on Superbowl bets right now.
This is a great weblog. I have been back many times within the last seven days and wish to join your rss feed using Google but can’t understand how to do it very well. Would you know of any sort of tutorials?
[...] was actually found was not Corexit at 13.3 parts per million, but the dangerous neurotoxin pesticide 2-butoxyethanol which is 30% to 60% ingredient of Corexit 9527A by volume and supposedly discontinued back in May [...]
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matthew Browning, Australia, official, Linda Leavitt, Linda Leavitt, GoodTwitty and others. GoodTwitty said: @WhoDat35 Corexit has been banned in Europe 10 yrs ,health effects r horrific http://is.gd/hrRLX [...]
[...] from the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico, is 11 times more lethal than oil alone. LinkCorexit was banned in the United Kingdom over a decade ago. It was banned it because, compared to [...]
[...] http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/ 2010/ 06/ 05/ amount-neurotoxin-pesticide-corexit-sprayed-bp-tops-… [...]
[...] points 5 minutes ago[+] (0 children)lt247 0 points1 point2 points 5 minutes ago[-]LINK permalinkparentsite linksmobilerssstoreawardsrandomhelphelpFAQreddiquettefeedbackhelp [...]
[...] [...]
[...] municipal water supply to protect their health." This is detailed in the link noted below: http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2010/06/05/amount-neurotoxin-pesticide-corexit-sprayed-bp-tops-1-mi… Third, he said "we launched our new web store in June on http://www.seychelle.com with a resounding [...]
[...] [...]
[...] grow faster, the sale of GMO crops that cause toxins in humans and unborn children, or the use of millions of gallons of neurotoxin pesticides to sink oil in the Gulf so BP doesn’t have to pay the cleanup bill the story is the same. Corporate profits and [...]
[...] wouldn’t have anything to do with the almost 2 million gallons of the neurotoxin pesticide Corexit that was sprayed into the Gulf to limit BP’s cleanup costs for the [...]
[...] [...]
[...] wouldn’t have anything to do with the almost 2 million gallons of the neurotoxin pesticide Corexit that was sprayed into the Gulf to limit BP’s cleanup costs [...]